If laws are passed making high-power LASERS illegal, an entirely new
category of "criminal" will be produced. Own a LASER? You're
automatically a criminal. Put you in prison. One step closer to the
Techno-Nazi Dictatorship that George Orwell in his
classic novel "1984" caught a
glimpse of, but could never have imagined in his wildest nightmares. I
propose an amendment to the second amendment:
"I'll own what I damn-well please, and
it's none of the government's damn business so long as I don't hurt
anyone",
and a slogan: "You'll pry my
LASER out of my cold, dead fingers".
ENOUGH WITH THE LEGISLATION, ALREADY!! It's time for common sense –
which isn't as 'common' as it used to be – to prevail.
On the night of September 11, 2010, after
demonstrating a LASER to a customer in Brooklyn, from my (former) office in Jersey City,
I had one of those moments of what can only be called "crystal
inspiration" or "flash of genius". I thought it over for a few days;
saying to myself "... surely... something so STUPIDLY simple would
have occurred to a MORON by now!!" But apparently not, since my
search on the Internet for even mention of such an idea turned up
nothing even close! And so, after a few days of kibitzing with myself, I
offer the following suggestion for what it's worth:
I, as a principal of Awesome LASERS LLC, would like to offer the
Airline Industry a suggestion. This will piss a lot of politicians off,
because if my idea were to be implemented, it would render the "political hay"
of LASER criminal legislation MOOT, because it would protect airline pilots
from any and all LASER "attacks" on their aircraft, and it would
ELIMINATE the need for any CRIMINAL penalties for (innocently or not)
pointing what amounts to – at any appreciable distance – an "amplified
flashlight" into the night sky.
If you INTENTIONALLY try to harass a flight crew and endanger people
(with a LASER or
without one), you should spend a few years picking up
soap with your toes in the shower.... and that'll teach ya'!– and send a
message to the rest of the morons, imbeciles, and sociopaths. But
morons, imbeciles, and sociopaths won't get the message, and that's why
they are morons, imbeciles, and sociopaths. These people who don't care
or don't know enough to care about other people, should be isolated from
society.
The INTENT –
what the law calls "mens
rea" – is the problem... most people don't INTEND to endanger,
much less harm anyone, and I can't bring myself to believe that a 12
year-old would consider it a thrill to knock a plane full of people out
of the sky with a LASER, or that he would believe it were even possible.
As much as the
politicians try to make of this, the MINIMUM
SAFE DISTANCE2
(MSD)
or NO HAZARD DISTANCE3
(NOHD)
on even the most powerful Hand-Held LASERS is only a few hundred yards – and if
you’re ½ mile away in a plane going 400MPH, you’re not going to be
INJURED by even a 1,000mw LASER like the one we demonstrated when Jim Hoffer interviewed me for Eyewitness NEWS.
It is even less likely that a person on the ground, aiming a LASER
manually could maintain a "lock" on the "target" for anything but an
accidental, fleeting moment. At any distance over 500 yards, the energy
imparted to the target is not enough to cause eye damage, but it would
be
distracting if it was coming right at you. This is primary due to the
divergence angle. The LIGHT, however, is still
EXTREMELY
bright, but
it is difficult to see the beam in daylight, again, unless it’s pointed DIRECTLY AT
YOU.
But all of that aside, here’s my idea:

From the
"Well.... duhhhh! Why didn't I think of that before?"
department:
We are all familiar with
the rolls of plastic window tint you can get at PepBoys or Sears to tint
a car’s windows. Why not get tinted film – it would have to be custom
manufactured because it would have to be two layers that filters out
632nm (green) and 445nm (blue) light – and apply it as an INSIDE
windshield treatment to all US Aircraft? (maybe I should PATENT this
idea, eh?)4
The cost would be one-time,
minimal, and require no maintenance (other than periodic cleaning which
is done anyway), and it would
make LASER distraction of pilots a MOOT ISSUE, and the
Assholes can shine all the
LASER beams they want to, have a LASER sky show disco party, and the pilots
would barely see it…. (oh, but then the politicians wouldn’t have an
issue to bandy about endlessly and propose more legislation to “prevent”
so they can appear to give a crap about us, and (stupid 'us') – we're
Gonorrhea
Lectim).
Tinting the cockpit windows against
632-650nm (green) would decrease normal SUNLIGHT glare DRAMATICALLY,
because our eyes are MOST SENSITIVE right where the GREEN LASERS are in
the visible spectrum. A second tint layer for 405-445nm (Violet / Blue)
would – in addition to filtering out the LASER light – protect the
pilots from the short-wavelength solar radiation – the same protection
you get from wearing “UV-Blocker” sunglasses. I wear the 445nm glasses
as sunglasses – and they’re great if you’re driving! In short, by so
treating the windows in an aircraft, the pilots would not only gain
protection from being distracted by LASERS, it would give them greater
visibility and less eyestrain when they must look out the window.
An EASY solution! (that’s
because I have a 170 [MENSA]5 IQ)
It would solve the
problem, and it would negate the need for turning adolescent pranksters
into Federal Inmates.
(No Applause, please…..
just doing my job as the resident genius).
FOOTNOTES
1. Stupidity is the
pursuit of ignorance; if you're ignorant, you can be educated, but
there's no hope for STUPID.
2. Minimum Safe Distance – the minimum distance at which actual
injury from a LASER is unlikely.
3. The distance at which actual injury from a LASER is almost
impossible.
4. This article is copyrighted, so I can prove the idea is mine – if there's
any money to be made here.
5. I was tested and invited to become a member in 1997, but I
declined because of the attitude of a few members, and the fact that
they employ "psychologists".